Blog

Enlarge this imageAbortion legal rights advocates protesting from the State Capitol in Austin, Texas, in 2013.Tamir Kalifa/APhide captiontoggle captionTamir Kalifa/APAbortion rights advocates protesting inside the Condition Capitol in Austin, Texas, in 2013.Tamir Kalifa/APA federal decide in Texas has overturned a ban with a normally applied second-trimester abortion procedure, dealing a different blow to initiatives to restrict abortion in that state. U.S. District Court Choose Lee Yeakel’s ruling adopted a short lived injunction i sued in August protecting against https://www.cubsedge.com/chicago-cubs/fergie-jenkins-jersey Here, http://alldrugs24h.com/, http://allpills24h.com/ Here, http://alldrugs24h.com/, http://allpills24h.com/, http://buycialisonline24h.com/, http://buypills24h.com/, http://buypillsonline24h.com/, http://buysildenafilonline24h.com/, http://buytadalafilonline24h.com/, http://buyviagraonline24h.com/, http://cheapviagraonline.com/, http://help-essay.info/, http://orderviagracheap.com/, http://tadalafilsildenafil.com/, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here. , http://buycialisonline24h.com/, http://buypills24h.com/, http://buypillsonline24h.com/, http://buysildenafilonline24h.com/, http://buytadalafilonline24h.com/, http://buyviagraonline24h.com/, http://cheapviagraonline.com/, http://help-essay.info/, http://orderviagracheap.com/, http://tadalafilsildenafil.com/, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here. Texas from outlawing the method recognised as dilation and evacuation, frequently referred to as “D&E.” That injunction came on the day before the ban was to have gone into effect. The Texas legislation, identified as Senate Bill 8 and signed by Gov. Greg Abbott earlier this year, was challenged in a lawsuit brought by abortion providers. They argued that the ban would require women seeking to terminate their pregnancies to undergo additional “unnece sary, invasive, and potentially painful medical procedures, in order to acce s their constitutional right to an abortion,” before beginning a D&E treatment. “The court is unaware of any other medical context that requires a doctor in contravention of the doctor’s medical judgment and the best Kris Bryant Jersey interest of the patient to conduct a medical technique that delivers no benefit to the woman,” Yeakel wrote.The judge’s ruling comes on the day his momentary injunction was to have expired. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton immediately filed a notice to appeal the ruling to the 5th U.S. Circuit Courtroom of Appeals. “During a five-day trial this month in district courtroom, we created a record unlike any other in exposing the horrors of dismemberment abortions. No just society should tolerate the tearing of living human beings to pieces,” Paxton said in a written statement. But Yeakel said that the bill impinges on the constitutional rights of women seeking a second-term abortion. He wrote:”The court docket concludes the Act is an inappropriate use of the State’s regulatory power over the medical profe sion to bar certain medical procedures and substitute others in furtherance of the State’s legitimate interest in regulating the medical profe sion in order to promote respect for the life of the unborn. The State’s valid interest in promoting respect for the life of the unborn, although legitimate, is not sufficient to justify such a substantial obstacle to the constitutionally protected right of a woman to terminate a pregnancy before fetal viability.”Yeakel added that at least seven other states have pa sed laws banning dilation and evacuation abortions. Courts in four states Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas and Oklahoma have prevented those laws from taking effect. A legal challenge is pending in Louisiana. Similar laws in Mi si sippi and West Virginia have not been contested. The ruling https://www.cubsedge.com/chicago-cubs/ryne-sandberg-jersey was praised by abortion legal rights advocates. “Today, facts and the rule of legislation once again prevailed over an unrelenting and coordinated political agenda against American women’s health and well-being. The court’s decision once again makes clear that politicians cannot force their way into private medical decisions that should stay between patients and physicians,” said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Legal rights, in a statement.Correction Nov. 24, 2017 A previous version of this story incorrectly spelled Nancy Northup’s last name as Northrup.